pp circle 500

A scientist has lost a test case which he hoped would force manufacturers and retailers to put health warnings on mobile phones.
Roger Coghill, of Cwmbran, Gwent, brought three charges under the Consumer Protection Act 1987 against a phone shop and its owner, claiming there were doubts over the safety of mobiles.
Magistrates in Abergavenny dismissed all charges.
The owner of Mobile Communication Services Ltd, of Cwmbran, faced two charges - one of failing to comply with the general safety requirement of the act and another of supplying a faulty phone.
Wayne Morgan's shop faced a seperate charge of failing to comply with the safety requirement.
Mr Coghill, 58, of Coghill Research Laboratories in Pontypool, launched the case "out of concern for the public's health and safety". He said he spent more than £20,000 privately bringing the case to court.
During the two-day hearing, he said that mobile phones could cause serious health damage including cancer.
He said he wanted mobile phone manufacturers to place health warnings on devices alerting customers to the possible danger of long term use.
Dr Alistair McKinlay, of the National Radiological Protection Board, said there was no scientific evidence to justify phones carrying warnings but that more research was needed. Dr McKinlay said: "This is a global issue, it is not just an issue for Abergavenny, or the UK, it is an important issue and it has to be assessed in a scientific sense globally."
After the hearing Mr Coghill said: "Mr Morgan has been acquitted but the mobile phone industry is still in the dock. It is only a matter of time before the biological facts catch up with our technology. In the interim some people will suffer from the failure to put warning signs on hand sets."
Mr Morgan said: "I am pleased for the industry that we can now breathe a sigh of relief and we can sell our phones legally. Until we have definitive proof it is all pure speculation and we should leave that to the scientists."

pp circle 500

Radiation from mobile phones can severely damage the human immune system, a scientist has claimed.
Biologist Roger Coghill has long campaigned for health warnings to be attached to mobile phones, which he has already linked to headaches and memory loss.
His latest research suggests the microwaves generated by mobile phones may damage the ability of white blood cells to act as the "policemen" of the body, fighting off infection and disease.
Mr Coghill took white blood cells, known as lymphocytes, from a donor, keeping them alive with nutritients and exposed them to different electric fields.
He found that after seven-and-a-half hours, just 13% of the cells exposed to mobile phone radiation remained intact and able to function, compared with 70% of cells exposed only to the natural electromagnetic field produced by the human body.
Mr Coghill claims the body's immune system is partially controlled by electromagnetic fields emitted by the body. He believes the radiation emitted by mobile phones damages the body's own electromagnetic fields, and undermines the proper functioning of the immune system.
Mr Coghill has launched a legal test case against a mobile phone shop for allegedly failing to warn customers of the potential risk of radiation.
The industry is worth a £14bn a year in Britain alone.
Mr Coghill was criticised by a leading industry figure for not announcing his findings before they had been reviewed by experts and published in a recognised scientific journal.
Tom Wills-Sandford, director of the Federation of the Electronics Industry, which represents mobile phone manufacturers, said: "None of the proper scientific protocol has been followed. "This is not a proper way to conduct science, and one wonders if these results will ever be published properly."
Mr Wills-Sandford said an enormous amount of research had been carried out into the safety of mobile phones but none had produced any real evidence of a risk to health. But Mr Coghill, who spoke at a conference on mobile phone safety in London on Thursday, insisted that his results were scientifically sound and should not be ignored.
He said: "We found that the competence of these white blood cells was depleted after being exposed for seven or eight hours to a mobile phone on standby. There's a possibility that we are damaging lymphocyte performance simply by having these phones on standby next to our bodies."
Mr Coghill said there was no danger in using mobile phones for two or three minutes.
But people who left them on for 20 minutes or more could be doing themselves harm.
If even 5% of the estimated 10 million users left their phones switched on it would mean 500,000 people were at risk, he said.
Mr Coghill said: "What I'm asking for is that the industry recognises that and puts warning labels on their phones."
He said a paper on his findings was accepted for inclusion at a major scientific meeting in Florida, USA, in June.
He was also going to be forwarding the results to a recognised journal and co-operating with other scientists trying to replicate the findings.
A spokesman for the National Radiological Protection Board, the radiation watchdog, said: "We have no comment to make on the claims made by Roger Coghill. If his work is published in a scientific journal it will be reviewed by the NRPB's advisory group on non-ionising radiation." 

pp circle 500

The UK mobile phone provider Orange has moved closer to profitability, reducing its pre-tax loss by a third during the first six months of the year.
The company posted a pre-tax loss of £49.1m compared with £73.5m in the same period a year ago, and for the first time made an operating profit, albeit small at £2.2m.
This compares to an operating loss of £40m last year. 
To explain the result Orange points to record growth figures. 
The company added 249,000 new customers to its network, up 27% since last year to a total 1.5m.
Orange is the UK's third biggest mobile phone operator and says that it now has a market share of 15%.
The expansion was helped by cheaper customer acquisition costs, mainly because the price of handsets have come down dramatically.
Managing director Hans Snook said the results showed "a significant acceleration in customer growth, good performance on our key business drivers and strong progress towards profitability."
He said the company looked forward to continued growth in the second half and planned to penetrate the market further with the launch in the autumn of a new competitive price cutting venture.
Earlier this year, Mr Snook had predicted that mobile phone use in the UK would reach 50% of the population by 2004.
Mobile phone shares have recently been good performers on the London Stock Exchange and analysts expect Orange shares to rise on the latest news.

pp circle 500

The demand for mobile phones to carry a health warning is to be heard in court.
Biologist Roger Coghill, who believes cellular phones are dangerous, says the South West Gwent Magistrates Court will hear his private criminal action on September 2.
Mr Coghill, who runs an independent radiation laboratory at Pontypool in Wales, says the mobile phone is the biggest domestic appliance source of radiation ever invented. He wants the phones to carry a warning that more than 20 minutes of continuous use may damage health.
His action is being taken against a local telephone store. His test case will try to establish a breach of consumer protection laws.
There is growing concern that the radiation emitted by mobile phones may be dangerous and Mr Coghill is calling for manufacturers to take up a more responsible attitude.
But the phone companies say the current regulations are sufficient to protect the public.
Nevertheless, the issue continues to stay in the spotlight. Only last week, it was reported that military scientists at the Defence Evaluation and Research Agency had done research which suggested that mobile phone signals could disrupt the part of the brain that controls memory and learning.
Other studies have suggested that mobiles - used by nine million people across Britain - can cause a rise in blood pressure and may harm pregnant women.
However, Britain's National Radiological Protection Board, charged with regulating mobile phone use, says none of the research is conclusive.
"There is nothing at present to suggest any need to change our current line that it is safe to use the current generation of mobile phones," Liz Francis, a NRPB spokeswoman says. 

pp circle 500

Government researchers have advised the public not to be alarmed by a report that mobile phones cause short-term memory loss and sudden confusion.
The Daily Mail carried a front page splash on a study carried out by military scientists at the Defence Evaluation and Research Agency which suggested that mobile phone signals disrupt part of the brain which controls memory and learning.
Recent studies have already found mobiles - used by nine million people across Britain - can cause a rise in blood pressure and may harm pregnant women.
And they have been linked with brain tumours, cancer, headaches and tiredness.
But a DERA spokesman, although admitting that the research had taken place, said it was not specifically into the impact of mobile phone signals.
He said: "No health warning has been announced, and the research has been hyped.
"The radio waves tested are those that are used by mobile phones, and it is quite exciting because obviously there is an effect, but we do not know whether it is long term or short term. More research is needed."
DERA scientists carried out experiments on rats with money from the Defence Ministry and Department of Health. The research was based on stimulating a slice of rat brain with broadcast radio signals at levels lower than current mobile phone safety limits.
The spokesman said: "It was noted that there was an effect on brain activity. When the radio waves were turned on brain activity stopped or slowed down, and when they were truned off brain activity started again."
Dr Alan Preece, a consultant clinical scientist carrying out research into the impact of mobile phone signals on human volunteers, said it was too early for alarm.
Dr Preece said radio waves did penetrate the human head, but most were absorbed in the skin and skull before reaching the brain. He said: "This research is carried out on rat brain slices, and it is an awfully big step to equate it to the impact on human brains. The public should wait for the outcome of human studies before getting too worried about it."
Dr Preece found radio waves do have impact on short term memory in a previous study, but at much lower frequencies than those used by mobile phones.
Liz Francis, a spokeswoman for the National Radiological Protection Board, said further research was needed on the impact on humans, and warned against generalising from animal research. She said: "There is nothing at present to suggest any need to change our current line that it is safe to use the current generation of mobile phones."
Some campaigners, however, believe mobile phones should carry warning labels. Scientist Dr Roger Coghill told the Daily Mail: "Anyone who uses a mobile phone for more than 20 minutes at at time needs their head examined." Last year a US study found rats lost their ability to learn simple tasks after exposure to microwave radiation similar to that emitted by mobile phones. 

pp circle 500

The British mobile phone network provider Orange has announced a 66% price cut for its mobile phone services in a bid to compete with rival discount schemes.
The UK's mobile phone business is becoming increasingly competitive as firms jostle to get more people to sign up to their products.
The cuts from Orange come just six weeks after Vodaphone cut its tariffs and a month after Cellnet introduced a new customer loyalty scheme offering tariff discounts. 
Under Tuesday's announcement from Orange, off-peak calls will cost subscribers 5p a minute from July.
The company is also launching a new tariff scheme - Talk 30 - offering subscribers to the scheme 30 minutes of free calls, and a credit scheme which will refund customers for calls that are cut off.
Orange's share price leapt on the news as the market welcomed the company's efforts to stay competitive. At 14:19 Orange shares were 45p higher at 596 as analysts reacted positively to the tariff initiatives and bullish subscriber growth comments.
The company said the numbers of its UK subscribers were up 20% compared to the same period last year.
The Orange basic tariff compares to an off-peak rate of 2p a minute for Vodaphone and 10p a minute from One 2 One and Cellnet.
But One 2 One operates various special subscription schemes by which customers can get free calls at weekends or evenings, while Cellnet's First initiative launched last month offers a range of discounts schemes from 3% to 15%.
A Cellnet spokesman said the schemes could cut customers tariffs to as low as 2p a minute.
Orange also revealed there would be further tariff cuts in its pre-pay service Just Talk in the autumn and a new scheme to attack the fixed-line market.
Doug Hawkins, analyst at Nomura, said: "Orange obviously has felt that it has lost some of the initiative to Vodafone, and these measures look fairly aggressive in terms of giving it a strong position and attracting new subscribers. The attempt to bring in wireline customers for the first time is particularly innovative."
He said Orange was trying to target the single-person household, which is mostly fairly affluent. He added: "That represents a challenge to British Telecom. They are seeking to establish their position as the leading innovator in the UK mobile market and for the first time they are now trying to attract wireline users to consider mobile as an alternative."

pp circle 500

A 27-year-old woman suffering from a brain tumour is to become the first person in Britain to bring a personal injury claim against mobile phone makers.
The woman, a company director who has not been identified, is convinced she developed the life-threatening tumour from using her mobile phone. 
Her case is being handled by Tom Jones, a solicitor working for Thompsons, who claim to be Britain's largest personal injury law firm.
Mr Jones said: "We believe this is the first case of its kind in the UK. Our client has no family history of cancer, she has never been exposed to radiation in any other form, there's no other reason why she should have a brain tumour."
Mr Jones will be using research recently published in Sweden linking mobile phones with headaches and fatigue to back the case, as well as other studies which point towards potential health hazards from using phones.
Scientists at the National Institute of Working Life in Umea, Sweden, who questioned 11,000 mobile phone users found the longer people used them, the more likely they were to report symptoms such as hot ears, burning skin, headaches and fatigue.
The research team said more studies were needed to prove that it was the mobile phones that caused the symptoms. It also showed there was no substantial difference in the effects of digital and analogue phones. Mobile phone makers insisted the report did not prove mobile phones had a harmful effect.
Symptoms such as headaches could be caused by other lifestyle and employment factors such as using VDUs, normal telephone usage or intensive periods of concentration such as driving or using microscopes.
A statement from the Federation of Communication Services Limited said hot ears could be caused by the heat generated by batteries used for a long time rather than from radio signals.
"The selection of a controlled group - persons without mobile phones - was not in the scope of this research. Therefore one must be very careful about making any conclusions beyond the focus of the study which was to determine whether GSM (digital) users reported symptoms more than NMT (analogue) users. No such differences were found and the study provides no evidence of harmful effects from the use of mobile phones."


A publicity campaign to warn motorists against driving while using hand-held mobile phones is getting into gear.

The start of the government-sponsored campaign coincides with the publication of new guidelines on the use of mobiles.

The guidelines, from the Federation of Communication Services, say drivers should never hold a mobile phone while driving.

Motorists are also advised to use hands-free mobiles only when it is safe to do so and to keep conversations short and simple.

Difficult calls and business "meetings" on the road are seen as unsafe.

The campaign is being supported by the RAC and other motoring organisations as well as the police, safety groups and the mobile communications industry.

Edmund King, the RAC's Head of Campaigns, said: "Hands-free mobile phones are, for many people, an essential part of everyday life.

"Used responsibly, they should cause no real distraction to the driver or danger to other road users."


The telephone watchdog Oftel wants mobile phone companies to cut their prices after a study found Britain had some of the highest charges in the world.

Don Cruickshank, Director General of Oftel, also criticised British Telecom after the 12-month investigation found it was charging 10p a minute too much to call a mobile phone from a land line.

The watchdog has referred the matter to the Monopolies and Mergers Commission, which will now carry out an investigation.

Operators of mobile phone networks, including Cellnet, Vodafone, One2One and Orange, are also criticised for the high cost and complex nature of the packages of tariffs and line rentals they sell.

Mr Cruickshank said he considered calls to mobile phones should be charged at about 20p per minute.

"Mobile phones are an increasingly important part of everyday life.

"They are no longer expensive toys for the few, but the cost of calling them is very high," he said.

Britain currently has 7.3 million mobile phone users but the figure is expected to hit 11 million within the next three years if prices are brought down.

The Oftel survey found the cost of a daytime call to Cellnet and Vodafone from a BT phone has fallen from 37.5p to 32p following demands made a year ago by the watchdog for prices to be cut.

BT defended its charges, saying the majority of its costs were dictated by the payment made to mobile operators for passing on calls.

It said charges had been reduced over the last 18 months and that its prices reflected the competitive UK market.

It said further reductions were "likely", but the decision to refer the matter to the MMC was unexpected: "We believe it to be unusual, if not unprecedented, for the director general to refer an issue to the MMC without having proposed and discussed potential licence changes with the interested parties."

The MMC investigation will look at the charges which BT, Vodafone and Cellnet make for calls to mobile phones.

Vodafone chief executive Chris Gent said competition was the best form of regulation and UK customers benefited from the widest choice of mobile phone services in Europe.

A recent survey suggested it would cost about £27.10 to use a mobile phone for 60 minutes in Britain compared with £10.84 in Germany.

pp circle 500

The British Government has commissioned a study using human guinea pigs to test whether the prolonged use of mobile phones carries serious health risks.
Eighteen volunteers are taking part in the study which is part of the Department of Health's radiation protection research programme. The tests, which are being carried out at Bristol University, are designed to detect short-term memory, reaction times and awareness in mobile phone users.
The volunteers will spend between 20 minutes to half-an-hour with a handset fixed to their heads, and carry out a series of tasks. Some of the handsets will be dummy ones, others will be real. It is part of a bigger project at Bristol University looking into the effects of microwave radiation on human beings.
Some scientists have suggested that radiation from mobile handsets could cause brain tumours, cancer, anxiety and memory loss, and there has been increasing concern amongst the public about the possible side-effects.
Dr Alan Preece of Bristol University, who is conducting the research, wrote in an article last year: "The facts are that cell phones emit either continuous microwaves at about 900 MHz or pulsed microwaves at 1.8 GHz and these must cause a small amount of tissue heating, including brain tissue."
Dr Preece says he has had a lot of enquiries from people worried about the effects of mobile phones. "There has been a lot of anecdotal evidence of people feeling weak, having memory problems and depression."
Official figures published last November showed that nearly one in five households in the UK possessed a mobile phone.